JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 16, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Rodrigo Pombo Cajiao

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma por cuanto demandante no corrigió en los términos indicados en el auto inadmisorio
  • Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque en el escrito de corrección el actor no logró subsanar los yerros identificados en la providencia de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación consideró que no le asiste razón al recurrente y por ello decidió CONFIRMAR el auto cuestionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. LEVANTAR la suspension de terminos en el asunto de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 2 de marzo de 2020, proferido por el Magistrado Antonio Jose Lizarazo Ocampo en el proceso D-13626, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Rodrigo Pombo Cajiao contra el numeral 3deg del articulo 209 de la Ley 1801 de 2016.
  3. TERCERO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision al recurrente, indicandole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  4. CUARTO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Presidente
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Magistrado
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Magistrado
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.